Skip to main content

Day 2 - Genesis 4 and 5

Some hold the notion that the Old Testament is filled primarily with doom and gloom. But the more I read through it, the more I am inclined to strongly disagree with that sentiment. We've already seen how God graciously gave man everything even though He knew that he would fall into temptation and disobey Him. Furthermore, God pronounced a shadow of the gospel of Christ (called the proto evangelion which is Greek for pre-gospel) in Genesis 3 right after the fall. In the chapters for today's reading, we see the themes of grace and eternal dwelling with God woven throughout the narrative.

It's hard to believe that Adam and Eve could recover after such a devastating failure. But God's mercy shown to them (the announcement of the serpent's demise and the sacrifice of the animals for the sake of covering their nakedness) made a deep impact upon how they would regard Him outside of the garden. For instance, when Eve gives birth to Cain, she states, "With the help of the LORD, I have brought forth a man." Eve acknowledged God's intervention in her conception of Cain (3:20) and in the delivery process. God was there from beginning to end. Though man was ultimately destined for death, God allowed for a glimmer of hope through new life. Notice also that the word LORD is the personal name for God seen in Exodus 3:14. God is not distant, but rather even in the midst of man's depravity and pain he reveals himself as Immanuel, God with us.

From the very beginnings of man's history outside of the garden, we witness the sinful depravity of his heart. Cain's brother Abel shows remarkable faith in that he offers God something even though there is absolutely no obligation for Him to accept it. God is holy and perfect, so what can man give to Him that is of any worth? Hebrews 11:4 explains that Abel came with an attitude of faith or trust. I personally believe that somehow, God's mercy in His acceptance of man even in his sinfulness was communicated to Abel. Abel had a trust relationship with God based on His one-sided grace of acceptance. This is actually gospel faith; we come to God based not on our merits, but on God's acceptance of us despite our depravity. To Cain, who lives by his own merit, this idea of offering by faith does not make sense. Furthermore, he seems to think it scandalous that God would not accept his offering, especially as the first born. Instead, God chooses the offering of the second born (btw, does this theme sound familiar?) Cain seems to think that somehow God is obligated to accept his offering, for why else would he become angry and despondent? What we see in Cain is a deeply rooted sense of pride. This is in fact what caused the downfall of Adam and Eve. It's the self-centered idea that we know better than our Creator. Cain could not control his pride and thus he rejected God's counsel to defend himself against deadly sin which was ever-looking to devour his soul. Cain slew Abel out of jealous pride and furthermore shunned God. Even after all of this, even in Cain's self-centered defense against God's punishment for murder, (“My punishment is more than I can bear. Today you are driving me from the land, and I will be hidden from your presence; I will be a restless wanderer on the earth, and whoever finds me will kill me.”) we see God's unbelievable mercy. He relents and mercifully protects Cain from harm.

I often like to single Cain out as the most selfish, murderous sinner in the early history of mankind. But I realize that I'm no different. How many times have I become jealous of my brother due to my pride? How many times have I felt as though God was obligated to do something for me? How many times have I neglected to care for my brother as though I were not somehow responsible for him? In my sin, I am the same murderer. Apart from the graces and mercy of God, I am the same self-centered, restless wanderer. It is only by his grace through Jesus Christ that I stand and can offer something of worth to him.

Sin is serious business though. We see the legacy of Cain in his descendants. They look impressive due to their ingenuity and social progressiveness. But then we begin to see the depravity of their culture. Polygamy springs up through Lamech. Furthermore, he promotes excessive vengeance (4:24). He reveals the wounded heart of man. In our woundedness, we become senseless and often want to take vengeance into our own hands, showing no mercy. This reminds me of the character from the movie Colombiana.

The early history of man seems to take another tragic turn. However, God primarily rules history. Thus, Adam and Eve conceive again and give birth to Seth. This is the beginning of a line of descendants who would begin to call on the name of the LORD. Eventually we see Noah come through this line. Through this, we see that God's promise in Genesis 3:15 is coming to fruition through His merciful providence. We also see a foreshadow of resurrection and eternal dwelling with God through Enoch's ascension.

As a side note, I have always wondered about the long lifespans of the figures in the account. Recently, science has revealed how it might have indeed been plausible for early man to live that long. Click here if you are interested in reading further about this.

The account of Seth's line ends with an introduction to Noah. It was prophesied that his life would bring comfort to the people.

I love the history that Genesis presents. In it, we see the early development of the psychology of sin and man's evil machinations. But at the same time, we see God's gracious providence. Thus we see hope for us all and that despite the way our world seems to be endlessly spiraling downward, God is in control of our redemption.

What stands out to you the most in these two chapters?

On what basis do you come to God?

How do you handle pride, which is innate to mankind?

Can you see God's sovereign working throughout history, even our current U.S. history?

hope to hear your thoughts soon.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Day 3 - Genesis 6-9

A man who finds a wife, finds what is good, however... Subtitle: My spiel on marriage, because I think it's an important issue How does one choose a mate? Should the decision be based on physical appearance, character, societal status or family background? While these are significant factors, in Genesis chapter six, it seems as though God was hoping that his people would choose based on an altogether different criterion. In the beginning of the chapter, we see that as men increased on the earth, the men of Seth's line (the sons of God) began to notice the women of Cain's line (the daughters of men). He who finds a wife, finds what is good, as the proverb goes. However, how one goes about finding their wife is an important matter to God. The men who at one time called upon the name of the LORD chose to leave God out of the process of finding suitable wives. They essentially based their decision on physical beauty and their own desires. To be sure, physical beauty is a ...

Day 12 - Genesis 27-28

Back Story of Jacob and Esau Last time, I skipped over writing about these two figures because I wanted to focus exclusively on the finality of Abraham’s story. But now, their story deserves the spotlight, so let’s then illuminate their respective estates. In order to drive home the point that God’s plan of salvation starts and finishes with the working of His power and will, His intervention is required again in the process of conception. Jacob and Esau are born as twins (with Esau coming out first). Duly noted should be Jacob’s deceptive character from the outset as, even from the time that they were in the womb, he grasped the foot of his brother; this will be a reoccurring them throughout his story. Also of importance is the prophecy concerning the two brothers before their births. Rumble in the Jungle, Part 1 Jacob sure did 'rope-a-dope' Esau like Ali did to Foreman Rebekah was perplexed about the jostling she felt in her womb. So she inquired of God...

The Function of the Myth of Meritocracy

"Haters" We like to think that those most successful in society are the ones who have achieved this by being smarter, more hardworking, more determined, and somehow "better" than the vast majority of citizens. Bezos, Musk, Gates, the list goes on. Geniuses, visionaries, iconoclasts, truth tellers, are some of the names we like to call them. Those who would criticize them are dubbed as lazy, close-minded, jealous, unsuccessful, "haters". The critics will say that these people obtained obscene wealth, and with it political power and cultural influence, via avarice, simply knowing how to play the game, having already come from a privileged position, and perhaps most damning of all, through government help. We can allow a mixture for both sides of supporters and critics.  Unmeritocratic Rise But, if anyone pays the slightest attention to the context and innerworkings of the rise of these figures, the existence of pure meritocracy should be obviously false. For...